#indiewebcamp 2013-12-15

2013-12-15 UTC
bnvk, pfenwick, tpinto_, melvster, fmarier, obensource, KartikPrabhu, skinny and Acidnerd joined the channel
tpinto_ and catsup joined the channel
dentonjacobs, tpinto_, brianloveswords, snarfed, fmarier, jschweinsberg, kylewm, caseorganic, melvster, andreypopp, LauraJ, skinny, eschnou, bnvk, otterdam, XgF, obensource, squeakytoy and friedcell joined the channel
#
@BarnabyWalters
Checked in to C is for Cookie, Reykjavik — working on my #indieweb checkin/note location UI, check i… http://waterpigs.co.uk/notes/4T_GAu/
(twitter.com/_/status/412253446373638145)
bnvk, snarfed and friedcell joined the channel
#
snarfed
morning indiewebcamp!
#
snarfed
coffee in hand, purring cat in my lap, hacking likes and reposts into brid.gy…shaping up to be a good morning
#
snarfed
aaronpk: hmm, looks like indiewebcamp.com is down?
kylewm and barnabywalters joined the channel
#
Loqi
barnabywalters: tantek left you a message on 12/13 at 10:29am: always fun when someone I know discovers one of my random domains.
#
barnabywalters
aaronpk: Indiewebcamp.com is down once more :(
#
snarfed
yeah, i pinged him too :/
tantek joined the channel
#
Loqi
tantek: aaronpk left you a message on 12/14 at 10:20am: you will probably be happy to know I finally now accept webmentions of my short URLs https://github.com/aaronpk/p3k/issues/27
#
Loqi
tantek: snarfed left you a message on 12/14 at 2:26pm: hey, i'm thinking about p-like and p-repost as possible experimental properties on h-entry, as embedded likes/reposts of the parent h-entry. parallels the existing experimental p-comment property. thoughts? if so, mind giving User:Snarfed edit privileges on the mf wiki? thanks!
#
tantek
aaronpk - great!
#
tantek
tried a curl webmention to it (of that one post I linked to a short domain) and got a 202
#
tantek
but you're not showing comments on articles yet right? perhaps you can check to see if my webmention got processed ok for that article?
#
tantek
snarfed - you should already have edit permissions for the microformats wiki - it may just be a specific page that's been locked down a bit. which page were you trying to edit?
#
snarfed
either microformats2 or h-entry
#
snarfed
i'll look
#
snarfed
iirc it said i didn't have edit privs because i didn't have create privs, which sounded odd, but meh
#
snarfed
ah, yeah. h-entry has been locked
#
snarfed
not urgent
#
tantek
try now. btw - feel free to lurk in #microformats as well - wiki edits go there too
#
tantek
(for the microformats wiki naturally)
#
snarfed
aha, looking editable, thanks!
#
snarfed
will do
#
snarfed
and indiewebcamp.com is back up, yay
#
tantek
not sure about p-like and p-repost though
#
tantek
as using to point to things which themselves are likes and reposts is the inverse of how Sandeep is using u-like and u-repost
#
tantek
and technically the prefix is just a parsing directive
#
tantek
there is only one "like" property and one "repost" property
#
tantek
(the prefix p- or u-)
#
tantek
sandeep is using u-like to point to the URL that is being liked
#
tantek
similarly with u-repost - to point to a URL that is being reposted
#
tantek
I'd say for embedded "embedded likes/reposts of the parent h-entry" just keep using the existing p-comment property
#
tantek
because they are comments of a sort
#
snarfed
oh sure, i'm using that too
#
tantek
otherwise it parses as if *your* blog post is a like of the likes
#
tantek
make sense?
#
snarfed
so an embedded p-comment with a u-like would be interpreted as a like instead of a comment?
#
tantek
there's no parsing nor semantic difference between say <span class=u-like>http://...</span> and <span class=p-like>http://...</span>
#
tantek
no it would be interpreted as a like of the thing you're linking to
#
snarfed
my use case was being able to connect an h-card with the u-like
#
snarfed
to represent the liker
#
snarfed
but if i just reuse embedded p-comments, that works
#
tantek
sandeep is using u-like and u-repost to link to the thing being liked or the thing being reposted
#
tantek
whereas your use is the opposite
#
snarfed
yes, i get that
#
snarfed
i need both cases, whereas he only needs the one
#
tantek
well it sounds more like you're trying to indicate the *type* of the post rather than a relationship
#
tantek
the type of the nested p-comment h-entry
#
snarfed
yup, that was the idea
#
tantek
the "object-type" of the nested h-entry in AS terms
#
tantek
so for indicating object types, a few of us have been using h-as-* on the same element as the h-entry
#
tantek
e.g. class="h-entry h-as-note"
#
tantek
or class="h-entry h-as-article"
#
tantek
so another approach could be to just keep extending that
#
tantek
class="h-entry h-as-like"
#
snarfed
ah, ok
#
tantek
which you can use *both* on likes that you post, and on likes that you embed as comments
#
snarfed
sure, sounds good
#
tantek
in the only thing is that it neither case does it indicate what you are liking
#
tantek
what the h-entry is a like of
#
snarfed
right now i'm using an embedded u-like for that
#
snarfed
just like comments have embedded u-in-reply-to
#
tantek
to link back to your original post?
#
tantek
perhaps we should have used u-like-of
#
tantek
and u-repost-of
#
tantek
to indicate that relationship like u-in-reply-to
#
tantek
rather than u-reply
#
tantek
which better communicates the relationship to the URL that is being linked to
#
snarfed
(still working on the html)
#
snarfed
maybe!
#
tantek
perhaps we can convince sandeep to switch to u-like-of and u-repost-of
#
snarfed
yeah, this is definitely making sense to me
#
snarfed
it seems like there are so few uses of u-like and u-repost in the wild that migrating wouldn't be hard
#
tantek
right
#
snarfed
idno, sandeep, barry frost…and then i start running out fast
#
tantek
yeah - and for all of them it's maybe one or two lines of code
#
tantek.com
edited /like (+699) "/* Experimental Markup */ counterproposal u-like-of"
(view diff)
#
snarfed
thanks!
#
tantek.com
edited /repost (+713) "counterproposal u-repost-of"
(view diff)
#
tantek
ok snarfed - at least we captured it
#
tantek
I'd say since there are so few implementations, feel free to implement the counterproposal, and then we can have a discussion about both methods
#
snarfed
agreed!
#
snarfed
brid.gy should hopefully be sending them in a day or two
#
tantek
nice!
eschnou joined the channel
eschnou joined the channel
#
tantek
10 year anniversary of the launch of XFN: http://tantek.com/log/2003/12.html#L20031215 - some links in there on blog markup thoughts from over a decade ago too (for the markup historians out there)
andreypopp, barnabywalters and KevinMarks joined the channel
#
Loqi
KevinMarks: tantek left you a message on 12/12 at 6:12pm: that TRON-like intro on the youtube of your talk is hilarious. And your talk is AWESOME! Well done.
#
Loqi
KevinMarks: bret left you a message on 12/12 at 8:08pm: enjoying your talk :)
andreypopp joined the channel
#
KevinMarks
thanks Bret
#
KevinMarks
!tell tantek - that was the intro branding for all of Le Web this year - nicely over the top producttion
#
ShaneHudson
!tell tantek - almost got lost in the archives of your site! So many hidden gems that I missed or forgot about! :)
eschnou, julian`, andreypopp and bnvk joined the channel
#
bnvk
snarfed: good mornin :)
#
bnvk
Why on god's earth does Google+ STILL not have a status update write API?
KevinMarks joined the channel
#
snarfed
morning!
#
snarfed
answer #1: it does, it's called the Moments API
#
bnvk
aw, nice
#
snarfed
answer #2: it doesn't, because they're deathly afraid of spam, where spam is broadly defined as anything that degrades the timeline experience
#
snarfed
(moments API works but is a slightly second class citizen)
#
snarfed
answer #3: it does, and it's closed to "partners." whee!
#
bnvk
Ah, I see! Thanks.
#
bnvk
Lol. Were you on the + team?
#
snarfed
no, but i have friends there
#
bnvk
Gotcha.
#
KevinMarks
moments API used to be the history API
#
KevinMarks
iirc moments API is effective archival - like the phot sync form android. You then need to manually decide whom to share it with
#
KevinMarks
there is a share on G+ button, so there is a JS API, but it's obfuscated
#
snarfed
i thought users could do that (share moments) per type though, as opposed to per post?
#
snarfed
ie so that it applied going forward
#
snarfed
(i've never used it personally)
#
waterpigs.co.uk
edited /phone (+285) "/* IndieWeb Examples */ added waterpigs.co.uk call me SIP button example"
(view diff)
#
waterpigs.co.uk
created /Phono (+215) "stubbed page about phono"
(view diff)
#
waterpigs.co.uk
edited /location (+21) "/* Enabling Technologies */ link to Nominatim"
(view diff)
#
waterpigs.co.uk
created /Nominatim (+585) "stubbed page about nominatim"
(view diff)
andreypopp joined the channel
#
waterpigs.co.uk
edited /Nominatim (+982) "added Nominatim -> microformats2 h-adr algorithm"
(view diff)
#
waterpigs.co.uk
edited /Nominatim (-52) "/* How to derive microformats2 data from Nominatim responses */ removed lat/long from algorithm, they just pass through"
(view diff)
#
waterpigs.co.uk
edited /Nominatim (+88) "added example details"
(view diff)
eschnou, melvster, CheckDavid, abrereton, snarfed and obensource joined the channel
#
snarfed
so…it looks facebook likes don't have permalinks. nor do instagram likes, twitter favorites, or g+ +1s
#
snarfed
does anyone know different?
#
KartikPrabhu
snarfed: I think that is true. AFAIK, all these actions are not considered separate 'posts' but as actions on the parent post
lukebrooker joined the channel
#
snarfed
thanks KartikPrabhu
skinny joined the channel
#
@vijinh0
Stumbled across a thought-provoking article on independent digital identity and authentication http://aralbalkan.com/notes/on-evolving-indieauth/ via @iaincollins
(twitter.com/_/status/412365362005426176)
#
@iaincollins
@vijinh0 I think @aral is really on to something with IndieAuth but I can't quite think how it should work. Like trying to remember a dream.
(twitter.com/_/status/412366022536990720)
fmarier, diarchy, kapitula and obensource joined the channel