#indiewebcamp 2013-06-12

2013-06-12 UTC
smus joined the channel
#
bret
woooooo schools out
#
aaronpk
friday!!
#
aaronpk
oh wait
#
bret
PSU is in finals week, just turned in my only final
#
bret
how up to date is your location on your website typically aaronpk?
#
aaronpk
if it's more than 1 minute old I either a) am not moving or b) am on a plane
melvster, mxuribe, bnvk and tilgovi joined the channel
#
bre.tc
edited /IndieAuth (+140) "/* To do */ Added my idea about Personas to the todo list"
(view diff)
reidab, smus and melvster joined the channel
#
@xtof_fr
#short-domain research
andreypopp joined the channel
tilgovi joined the channel
#
silona.org
edited /2013/Guest_List (-428) "/* Apprentices */"
(view diff)
#
@xtof_fr
#indieweb Thx @billcpu for this economy : #dataexpense:118USD (#lebateau #lybie) http://www.flickr.com/photo.gne?short=eKaAec
b0bg0d, ShishKabab, josephboyle and cweiske joined the channel
#
Loqi
cweiske: sandeepshetty left you a message 8 hours, 14 minutes ago: IMO, send a webmention when a link is bookmarked but don't send one for voting because it seems like an action on "your" software rather than on the link that was bookmarked. Does that make sense?
b0bg0d joined the channel
#
@philippeback
Effectivement les silos c'est pas bô. http://christopheducamp.com/w/IndieWeb
#
roblord.org
edited /2013/Guest_List (+334) "/* Creators */"
(view diff)
#
roblord.org
edited /2013/Guest_List (+20) "/* Creators */"
(view diff)
friedcell and julien51 joined the channel
#
roblord.org
edited /2013/Guest_List (+3) "/* Creators */"
(view diff)
b0bg0d and sandeepshetty joined the channel
#
sandeepshetty
tommorris: what's your pingback endpoint?
#
sandeepshetty
tommorris: also your h-card doesn't have an author url, do you prefer people linking to the email isntead?
b0bg0d joined the channel
#
sandeepshetty
!tell tommorris: want to send a pingback for http://www.sandeep.io/49 but I can't seem to find the pingback headers/link rel. Wondering how barnabywalters sent you the pingback...
#
Loqi
Ok, I'll tell them that when I see them next
peck_lx, bnvk, melvster, julien51, scor, _grawity, mxuribe, mxuribe1 and href joined the channel
#
@haverholm
Worried about internet surveillance and your privacy? Here's a list of #IndieWeb projects: http://indiewebcamp.com/projects #prism
eschnou, brbcoding, scor, mxuribe and sandeepshetty joined the channel
#
sandeep.io
edited /projects (+366) "/* experimental */ Added converspace"
(view diff)
evanpro, b0bg0d, julien51, mxuribe, josephboyle, sandeepshetty, punkprogrammer, scor_, spinnerin, melvster, tantek, brianloveswords and ShishKabab joined the channel
#
@ozten
@blaine Are you going to OSBridge or IndieWebCamp? Sent you an email from my http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/new/ account about Poetica and your post.
benwerd joined the channel
#
aaronpk
that's not bad! except for the markdown ;)
andreypopp joined the channel
#
tantek
sandeepshetty - I'm liking the presentation you're using for "likes" on your own site.
#
sandeepshetty
thanks... I'm liking them too :)
#
sandeepshetty
would love to get some feedback on http://www.sandeep.io/45
#
tantek
aaronpk - the markdown is not bad for a plain text summary - especially if you autolink it the hyperlink will be clickable
#
aaronpk
yea, I think I just have a personal hatred of the markdown link syntax
#
tantek
sandeepshetty - share - haha - it's a lost cause
#
tantek
aaronpk - I don't blame you
#
tantek
sandeepshetty - share has been so watered down it that all it means at this point is "do something"
#
tantek
so if you find yourself thinking, oh I should call this "share", then what it really means is that you're having trouble coming up with a specific verb, or specific UI for a specific verb, and you're falling back to a ( DO SOMETHING ) button
#
tantek
or post type
#
tantek
let me see if I can dig up the post on this
#
tantek
hmm - apparently I say "share" in posts quite often
#
sandeepshetty
:) do you have a suggestion given the context in that post? I've linked to an example post there where I just have a link and I do that very often...
#
tantek
found my brief debunking of "share" from a UI/UX perspective: http://tantek.com/2012/152/b1/citation-ui-focus-enabling-design#share-all-things
#
sandeepshetty
I think what differentiates more than it being link is that it's not a post..
b0bg0d joined the channel
#
tantek
"sharing a link" has typically been called public "bookmarking"
#
tantek
or posting a "bookmark"
#
tantek
(no new verb needed)
#
tantek
sandeepshetty - or e.g. it *is* a post just of post type "bookmark"
#
tantek
I don't think it merits a new post type though
#
sandeepshetty
no i mean the link target is not a post
#
sandeepshetty
it could be a link to a web app
#
tantek
in my opinion sharing a link is just a subset of a "note"
#
tantek
it's not interesting enough to merit its own post type or presentation
#
tantek
it's just a note that happens to only have a URL
#
tantek
which could easily include a URL and a few words of commentary
#
tantek
or a a URL and a few hashtags to more easily find it later
#
sandeepshetty
it's more close to repost than a note... with a note you can be sure I'm saying something
#
tantek
it's not a repost
#
tantek
because, as you said, you're not reposting the contents
#
tantek
and the destination link might not be a post either
#
tantek
it's just a note with only a URL
#
tantek
nothing more
#
sandeepshetty
I will be doing a preview.. just i do with like and reposts
#
tantek
and many of us do previews with URLs in notes also
#
tantek
e.g. aaronpk does it
#
tantek
p3k that is
#
tantek
and I do it with Falcon for links to media (images & video)
#
sandeepshetty
a note is more about me expressing personal opinion...
#
sandeepshetty
this is more me pointing to something...
#
tantek
in practice a lot of notes have a single URL and an optional opinion
#
tantek
people often share just links on twitter
#
sandeepshetty
BTW i identify with the context of my site primarily serving my readers
#
tantek
and I'm saying there's insufficient difference between a note with just a link and a note with a link and a few words
#
tantek
it doesn't merit a new type nor presentation
#
sandeepshetty
it does from a ux perpective for me because it gives a different signal to my readers
#
sandeepshetty
it similar to how blogs used to do posts and remainder link (i think thats what they were called)
julien51 joined the channel
#
tantek
what people called "remainder links" was even different from either of those
#
tantek
they were posts that were *collections* of links
#
tantek
not just one link per post
#
tantek
might have been called "remaindered links" also
#
tantek
sandeepshetty - re: http://www.sandeep.io/47 - people *do* post photos on Twitter ever since Twitter started natively hosting pic.twitter.com photos and built-in photo taking/posting into their apps.
#
tantek
not sure about video - I don't know if they support posting videos to pic.twitter.com
#
sandeepshetty
as a reader it appears a link that i click to get more details on atleast on mobile...
#
aaronpk
interestingly, photos on twitter are still just links to the photo. it's just that twitter built the service
#
sandeepshetty
and previews are just that... preview of *links*
#
sandeepshetty
twitter doesn't say you've shared a photo... it just adds a lionk to your tweet... unlike fb
#
aaronpk
it's the same way I posted this photo as a note, http://aaron.pk/n4Ns2 even though the file itself is under the same path as the note text
cweiske joined the channel
#
tantek.com
created /share (+614) "stub with the problem with share"
(view diff)
#
tantek
aaronpk - that's an interesting distinction. I can see what you mean. It's like Twitter built a partial photo hosting silo, that you can only access through their note posting silo as a side-effect.
#
tantek
One distinction is that there are separate pic.twitter.com permalink URLs for the photo posts themselves
#
sandeepshetty
they extended the facebook og approach to photos
#
tantek
and those are the ones that get put in tweets
#
aaronpk
that's true, twitter has even one more level of indirection since the link isn't to the JPG, it's to an HTML page
#
tantek
and that HTML page is their photo hosting service
#
tantek
that's my point, Twitter *does* have a photo silo
#
tantek
that's my contradiction of sandeep's assertion in his /47
#
aaronpk
I see it as sharing links to the photos as well
#
tantek
you *do* share photos on pic.twitter.com. you share links to them on twitter.com
#
sandeepshetty
yeah but from a users perpective it could be any service as long as twitter provides a previw
#
tantek
sandeepshetty - not true - when you share photos on pic.twitter.com - it's MORE than a preview
#
aaronpk
it's a nearly identical experience with flickr for example
#
tantek
it's a fully embedded lightbox experience
#
tantek
no it is NOT identical - not even close
#
aaronpk
how is that different?
#
tantek
click on the pic.twitter.com URL that's how that's different
#
tantek
note that it doesn't open in a new tab/window
#
tantek
it opens *in place*
#
tantek
and note that it links back to the note
#
tantek
*very* different experience, flow etc.
#
aaronpk
i wouldn't call it a lightbox
#
tantek
no I wouldn't either, I'll amend that
#
sandeepshetty
so does the other one... both open in a modal
#
aaronpk
loqi wtf
#
tantek
there is NOTHING modal about that URL
#
tantek
sandeepshetty - that is incorrect
#
aaronpk
that photo permalink doesn't even look like you're on twitter.com
#
aaronpk
it just happens to have the same domain as twitter.com
#
tantek
aaronpk - that's because you're on the photo hosting service subset of twitter.com
#
sandeepshetty
how did you get to it?
#
aaronpk
right, which is what i'm trying to say
#
tantek
that's a native photo post on twitter.com
#
aaronpk
it's not twitter.com, it's the photo hosting service
#
aaronpk
which is not native to twitter
#
tantek
it's Twitter.com's photo hosting service
#
sandeepshetty
thats incidental..
#
tantek
URL starts with twitter.com = native to Twitter
#
tantek
not at all
#
tantek
no other photo links work like that
#
sandeepshetty
i could be any service
#
tantek
no it couldn't
#
tantek
because all other services work differently
#
sandeepshetty
how did you get to that fullscreen preview?
#
tantek
I clicked on the pic.twitter link in the note
#
aaronpk
the only thing the flickr example doesn't have is a link back to the tweet
#
sandeepshetty
i get a modal when i do that
#
tantek
sandeepshetty - "fullscreen preview" is an oxymoron
#
tantek
it's not a preview
#
tantek
it's the actual photo
#
tantek
actual photo permalink
#
sandeepshetty
i dont get that though
#
tantek
actual photo *post* permalink that is
#
tantek
I"m looking it at on the weeb
#
tantek
on Firefox
#
tantek
where are you looking at it?
#
sandeepshetty
then its the same as any other app..
#
tantek
it's not
#
sandeepshetty
if the link take you to another service..
#
tantek
sandeepshetty - you're not reading what I wrote above
#
sandeepshetty
it's just that no other services do what it does yet
#
tantek
e.g. "note that it doesn't open in a new tab/window"
#
tantek
that's control on Twitter's side
#
tantek
shows evidence that it's a photo post
#
tantek
rather than a separate service
#
aaronpk
whether or not a link opens a new window is kind of irrelevant... I can always ctrl-click to open any link in a new window
#
tantek
also, reasoning by "does yet" or "could do" is not evidence - it's purely hypothetical
#
tantek
thus your arguments hold much less weight
#
tantek
than actually analyzing *existing* behavior *now*
#
tantek
aaronpk - nah - links to external stuff opens in new tabs across many social services, and links to native posts in those services opens in the same tab/window
#
tantek
that's common across Twitter/FB/G+
#
tantek
that's the convention for native posts vs. links to external things
#
tantek
and users are used to that difference
#
tantek
I think you're wanting to put Twitter in a box instead of looking at the preponderance of evidence of the behavior of the system
#
tantek
and how that behavior resembles others' behavior
friedcell, eschnou and b0bg0d joined the channel
#
tantek.com
created /like (+754) "stub with real world indieweb example from sandeepshetty"
(view diff)
#
tantek
sandeepshetty - ok your real world indieweb example of a "like" post type is worthy of capturing and documenting as something different - since you've chosen to give it an interesting and distinctive appearance / presentation
#
tantek.com
edited /posts (+77) "/* Kinds of Posts */ added like"
(view diff)
#
sandeepshetty
ok I'm back... the recursive linking on the fullscreen photo on twitter is weird
#
sandeepshetty
re "done yet" and "could do", it's useful when stuff us possible but not done yet but you are right in this case: I don't think twitter will open external service links in place
#
sandeepshetty
let me reframe this in the context of what I want to do.. I would just treat photos as previews.... like aaronpk does
#
sandeepshetty
lastely re "share" : even if it means "do something" it's a better verb than "do something" and as a long time Android user I think it works very well
#
sandeepshetty
just like the http verb "post" is better than "do something"
#
tantek
but "post" is not "do something" - it has more specific semantics
#
tantek
"do something" includes all kinds of things like mailto: etc.
#
tantek
"share" is just a pretend verb
#
tantek
just use "do" if you can't think of anything specific
#
tantek
sandeepshetty - wrote this up thanks to your example: http://indiewebcamp.com/like
#
tantek
also - it's not really recursive linking - it's reciprocal linking ;)
#
tantek.com
edited /posts (+135) "/* Footer sections */ likes"
(view diff)
#
tantek.com
created /likes (+985) "stub with likes as a part of a post"
(view diff)
#
sandeepshetty
tantek: thanks for writing that up... I'll add a screenshot ot it.
#
tantek
and a quick stub about what's displayed *on* posts ( http://indiewebcamp.com/likes ) as opposed to "like" posts themselves - which are two different things
#
tantek
(not going to repeat the "reply" post vs. "comments" section of a post mistake)
#
tantek
sandeepshetty - great! thanks for pioneering the "like" post type on the indie web :)
#
sandeepshetty
tantek: Re "share" is just a pretend verb It's not, and has a very real social context
#
sandeepshetty
I'm sharing things with my readers
#
tantek
sandeepshetty - that's what "share" used to mean
#
sandeepshetty
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/share "to tell (as thoughts, feelings, or experiences) to others —often used with with"
#
tantek
until people started saying "share" to dropbox, or to email, or to a printer
#
tantek
where "share" just became "send"
#
tantek
new word, same concept
#
sandeepshetty
so lets reclaim it then, rather than give it up
#
tantek
it's too late
#
tantek
google/android killed it
#
tantek
actually, "share" is a good example of bulshytt
#
tantek.com
edited /bulshytt (+40) "see also"
(view diff)
#
tantek.com
edited /share (+119) "share qualifies as bulshytt"
(view diff)
#
sandeepshetty
I'll choose to disagree :) especially given the fact that I'm using it in the same way that millions of facebook users are used to
#
tantek
sandeepshetty - ok, re: reclaim. so how you would you precisely define "share" different than Google/Android's meaningless version (do something), or just a synonym for "post" or "send"?
#
sandeepshetty
also another interesting thing with converspace is that like is not a different post type.. they are all posts just with different verbs
#
sandeepshetty
which is why photos doesn't make sense in my context
#
tantek
sounds like your conceptual model might be getting in the way of a useful feature ;)
#
tantek.com
edited /share (+348) "strawman reclaiming proposal"
(view diff)
#
tantek
ok sandeepshetty - though I'm not sure there's much hope, I wrote this up for you: http://indiewebcamp.com/share#Reclaiming
#
tantek
feel free to expand - I tried to provide a specific definition which you're welcome to add to or replace
#
tantek
I'm actively enabling you to prove me wrong :)
#
sandeepshetty
Looks like I have a lot of wiki pages to edit tonight :)
#
tantek
= science :)
#
sandeepshetty
a microformats question related to how were are using it for comments..
#
tantek
words I never want to see in my email client: "Welcome to your new inbox"
#
tantek
fracking #gmail
#
sandeepshetty
I was just implementing showing comments on my site... it looks like everyone is showing "name" or "summary" because they are plaintext..
#
sandeepshetty
instead of the content which seems to be the "right" thing to do with comments..
#
sandeepshetty
aaronpk: what are you doing in this case?
tilgovi and tantek joined the channel
#
tantek
sandeepshetty, aaronpk - didn't we have this discussion in IRC already? whether you get the content from "summary" or "content", if you want plain text, you have to strip tags yourself.
#
tantek.com
edited /like (+20) "like is also a webaction"
(view diff)
#
tantek.com
edited /like (-2) "-A"
(view diff)
#
sandeepshetty
we did , I created /plaintext that day but everyone seems to agree on showing name or summary right now ... I think we should show content (which is why I have hidden plaintext content)
#
tantek.com
edited /posts (+44) "/* Footer sections */"
(view diff)
#
tantek
sandeepshetty - it's because we discussed it a while ago I wrote this up accordingly: http://indiewebcamp.com/comments-presentation#How_to_display
#
tantek
note the list item "get the text of the comment to display"
#
tantek
there's an actual algorithm / heuristic there beyond "everyone seems to agree on showing name or summary "
#
aaronpk
sorry in emergency mode, will catch up on this later
#
tantek
np aaronpk - good luck!
#
sandeepshetty
tantek: thanks that help... I should get into the habit of looking at the wiki first ... though I wish those sections/page were linked to irc discussion
andreypopp joined the channel
#
sandeepshetty
it's the only open source one i can point to :)
#
cweiske
wait. it isn't about pingback itself
#
sandeepshetty
from irc conversation it looks like aaronpk picks up "only name" (http://indiewebcamp.com/irc/2013-05-29#t1369856550)
#
sandeepshetty
cweiske: yeah it's more to do with picking up microformats from source
b0bg0d joined the channel
#
tantek
cweiske - yeah, pingback never handled the presentation layer particularly well. In fact, quite the opposite - the few hints it had were very poor UI: http://indiewebcamp.com/comments-presentation#Existing_specifications_for_display
#
tantek
so we've fixed that now :)
#
tommorris
hey indiewebsters
josephboyle joined the channel
#
Loqi
tommorris: sandeepshetty left you a message 9 hours, 58 minutes ago: want to send a pingback for http://www.sandeep.io/49 but I can't seem to find the pingback headers/link rel. Wondering how barnabywalters sent you the pingback...
#
tommorris
sandeepshetty: yes, was going to answer that. the 'pingbacks' on my site are currently fake. it's just frontend. I add them manually. I need to wire up pingback/webmention at some point
#
tommorris
also, barcamp this weekend. should give an indieweb session
#
tommorris
this is what I was working on this morning - http://cl.ly/image/0m142f2J0l2c - not indieweb, but openstreetmap crowdsourcey plumbing. ;)
andreypopp and eschnou joined the channel
#
tantek
sandeepshetty, one of the problems with markdown link syntax - and syndicating it - it can break typical auto-linkers, e.g. your first comment on http://eschnou.com/entry/testing-indieweb-federation-with-waterpigscouk-aaronpareckicom-and--62-24908.html ends up linking to http://www.webmention.org%29/Pingback which doesn't exist
#
sandeepshetty
yeah I saw that and told him about that on IRC.. wikipedia seems to () in links all the time
#
sandeepshetty
s/to/to use
#
Loqi
sandeepshetty meant to say: yeah I saw that and to useld him about that on IRC.. wikipedia seems to use () in links all the time
#
tantek
sandeepshetty - in this case it was your error - you missed a trailing slash on your URL
#
tantek
so the close parenthesis got included as part of the TLD
#
sandeepshetty
actually it's assuming ) as part of the tld
#
sandeepshetty
because it shouldn't accept a ) before a /
#
sandeepshetty
it would still break but break differently
#
sandeepshetty
I mean the way it is interpreting it right now
#
tantek
ok I just checked and my cassis.js auto_link handles your text just fine: auto_link("Just implemented the ability to send [WebMentions](http://webmention.org)/Pingback.")
#
tantek
but apparently colloquy doesn't ;)
#
tantek
my code produces:
#
tantek
Just implemented the ability to send [WebMentions](<a class="auto-link" href="http://webmention.org">http://webmention.org</a>)/Pingback.
#
tantek
so yes, his code should be handling it better. that being said, you can publish more strictly by putting a trailing slash on top level URLs like that
#
sandeepshetty
with the trailing slash it becomes a valid...
#
tantek
maybe put spaces around the URL?
#
sandeepshetty
in the worn way because to accommodate wikipedia urls you have to allow for ( and ) in path segements
#
sandeepshetty
s/worn/wrong
#
Loqi
sandeepshetty meant to say: in the wrong way because to accommodate wikipedia urls you have to allow for ( and ) in path segements
#
sandeepshetty
space is a better workaround
#
tantek
sort of - Wikipedia URLs always use ( ) in matching pairs
#
sandeepshetty
but ppl don't write regexes that way
#
tantek
my auto_link code knows when to include a ")" at the end of a URL and when not to :)
#
sandeepshetty
they just put it in character classes
#
tantek
WFM ;)
#
blog.gratzi.org
edited /2013/Guest_List (+387) "/* Creators */"
(view diff)
#
sandeepshetty
funny I googled it but just noticed the linked bullets :)
#
tantek
huh, gratzi.org doesn't seem like a personal site
julien51 joined the channel
#
blog.gratzi.org
edited /2013/Guest_List (+5) "/* Creators */"
(view diff)
#
sandeepshetty
"gratzi is an example of an unhosted application. "
#
tantek
well then we'll just have to ask him to explain at the camp ;)
#
tantek
aw Silona is not coming
#
sandeepshetty
but it does look like a product site than a personal site.. especially with all the "we"
#
blog.gratzi.org
edited /2013/Guest_List (-4) "/* Creators */"
(view diff)
#
tantek
sandeepshetty - so far we haven't had to enforce the - your domain should be your personal domain thing
#
tantek
so I'm leaning toward giving him a chance to explain himself ;)
#
iamshane.com
edited /bulshytt (+250) ""Bullshytt" is bullshit."
(view diff)
#
tantek.com
edited /bulshytt (+217) "response to criticism, cited Wikipedia naturally"
(view diff)
#
blog.gratzi.org
edited /2013/Guest_List (+239) "/* Apprentices */"
(view diff)
#
blog.gratzi.org
edited /2013/Guest_List (+17) "/* Apprentices */"
(view diff)
tilgovi joined the channel
#
tantek.com
edited /share (+298) "move criticism to a new section"
(view diff)
#
sandeep.io
edited /share (+2) "/* Criticism */"
(view diff)
#
sandeep.io
edited /share (-254) "Removed reclaiming section since it's not needed IMO, and added a comment to criticism counter."
(view diff)
#
tantek.com
edited /2013/Guest_List (+137) "sort Rob Lord, update counts, note duplicate URL usage for apprentice, note product URL rather than personal URL"
(view diff)
#
sandeep.io
edited /share (+37) "/* Criticism */"
(view diff)
#
sandeep.io
edited /share (+19) "/* Perspectives */"
(view diff)
#
sandeep.io
edited /share (+47) "/* Criticism */"
(view diff)
#
tantek.com
edited /share (+697) "provide examples section, and start listing examples of sites / tools / platforms that have made share meaningless"
(view diff)
#
tantek
10 days left til indiewebcamp 2013 and 10 spots left!
#
sandeep.io
edited /share (+270) "/* Criticism */ note about examples."
(view diff)
#
sandeepshetty
shared an update: time for me to get some shut eye :)
#
tantek.com
edited /share (+192) "follow-up - this is not Wikipedia, we demonstrate points here with original research, as documented with real world examples"
(view diff)
andreypopp joined the channel
#
sandeep.io
edited /share (+194) "/* Perspectives */ I wasn't talking about a share button"
(view diff)
#
bret
Is there any video or audio from past IWCs?
#
tantek
not AFAIK
#
tantek
unless someone recorded the Google Hangout from 2012
#
sandeep.io
edited /share (+250) "/* Criticism */ still requires objective data."
(view diff)
#
tantek.com
edited /share (+496) "/* Criticism */ majority people perception is unnecessary if sites are adopting a convention - that's sufficient "proof". provide real world example site UIs as (counter-)examples"
(view diff)
#
tantek
hmm - something changed with the Twitter API and it looks my snowflake POSSE code to Twitter is busted.
#
tantek
(insert Twitter API maintenance tax whinging here)
fmarier, b0bg0d and andreypopp joined the channel
#
bret
twitter needs a meta API, so that people can develop off that, and the meta API would be used to accomidate all their random changes for lots of people
#
tantek
bret I believe that's been tried, it was called WSDL ;)
#
tantek
oh and then Google tried again, with their ill-fated "Web Intents"
b0bg0d joined the channel
#
melvster
bret: there is a meta api
#
EHLOVader
bret: did you just get caught with v1?
#
tantek.com
edited /IndieAuth (+378) "/* Twitter t.co */ Perhaps related - relmeauth / tmhOAuth issue (PHP libraries)"
(view diff)
#
tantek
sockethub sounds interesting
spinnerin joined the channel